Cognitive frailty: a conceptual systematic review and an operational proposal for future research

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psicoloxía Evolutiva e da Educaciónes_ES
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radioloxía, Saúde Pública, Enfermaría e Medicinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFacal Mayo, David
dc.contributor.authorMaseda Rodríguez, Ana Belén
dc.contributor.authorPereiro Rozas, Arturo X.
dc.contributor.authorGandoy Crego, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorLorenzo López, Laura
dc.contributor.authorYanguas, Javier
dc.contributor.authorMillán Calenti, José Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T09:26:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T09:26:27Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.description.abstractObjective To analyze the definition of “cognitive frailty” and to study the conceptual and operational definitions used and their implications for empirical research. The relationships between this concept and cognitive reserve, the role of neuropathology and brain reserve, motor signs of aging and the reversibility of cognitive frailty are also discussed. Study design Systematic review of empirical studies identified from Medline Advanced 1966, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus until August 2017. Main – outcome measures Effect sizes. The quality of the articles was assessed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Statement. Three independent reviewers participated in the study selection and data extraction. Results Nineteen studies involving 31,707 participants met the inclusion criteria. Significant associations were reported between cognitive frailty and physical frailty or gait speed. Screening instruments were usually used to determine pbjective cognitive decline rather than extensive neuropsychological assessments. Educational level was the only indicator of cognitive reserve that was systematically included in the evaluation of cognitive frailty. Motor decline and gait variables were not systematically included in protocols for the assessment of cognitive frailty. Conclusions A strong operational definition would benefit both the development of treatments to counter cognitive frailty and the assessment of treatment effectiveness. Nevertheless, since there is clear agreement regarding the importance of interventions for and the prevention of cognitive frailty, randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of preventive interventions are necessaryes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Xunta de Galicia (ED431C-2017/27, ED431C 2017/49, ED431F 2017/09, and Frailty NetworkIN607C 2016/08)es_ES
dc.identifier.citationMaturitas 121 (2019) 48-56es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.006
dc.identifier.essn0378-5122
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/31980
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.006es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCognitive frailtyes_ES
dc.subjectCognitive aginges_ES
dc.subjectCognitive impairmentes_ES
dc.subjectPhysical frailtyes_ES
dc.subjectCognitive reservees_ES
dc.titleCognitive frailty: a conceptual systematic review and an operational proposal for future researches_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3adcefeb-90f6-42c2-9e6b-5b8780b495b5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8d661513-25cb-4ef4-89f8-ff3a52976967
relation.isAuthorOfPublication33a7995a-bcf5-4d25-9ac6-1a20565bc1ab
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery3adcefeb-90f6-42c2-9e6b-5b8780b495b5

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2019_Maturitas_Facal_Cognitive.pdf
Size:
426.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artigo de investigación