Implicit Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Issues
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ubiquity Press
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to discuss the main conceptual and methodological issues raised by implicit learning research I begin by stating a general definition of this implicit learning, and then discuss under which circumstances can such a definition be operationalized. I claim that (1) a specific relationship between intention to learn and the conscious vs. unconscious nature of the learning results should be assumed, and (2) that one of several possible assumptions regarding the sensitivity of any measure of performance to the contents of awareness should also be stipulated before it is possible to choose among several methodological strategies to demonstrate the existence of implicit learning. In the absence of a complete theory of awareness, it is argued that only the weakest assumption, namely that no measure of performance can be taken as an absolute index of awareness, can safely be accepted. However, despite the weakness of this methodological scenario, some empirical results (Jiménez, Mendez, & Cleeremans, 1996) are described as a way to illustrate that this framework still leaves some room to demonstrate the existence of implicit learning
Description
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
Jiménez, L., 1997. Implicit Learning: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Psychologica Belgica, 37(1-2), pp.9–28. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pb.906
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
http://doi.org/10.5334/pb.906Sponsors
Rights
© 1997 by the authors. Published by Ubiquity Press. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (unless stated otherwise) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited







