¿Qué unidades debemos emplear? Las “dos disciplinas” de la psicología de la personalidad
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
Abstract
Uno de los debates más duraderos en psicología de la personalidad hace referencia a las unidades de análisis que definen la disciplina. El problema fue formulado por G.W. Allport hace ya varias décadas, fue ampliamente discutido con la crisis de la consistencia y, en la actualidad, parece recrudecerse, con dos grandes posturas enfrentadas: los modelos de rasgos (especialmente el modelo de cinco factores) y los planteamientos socialcognitivos. Este artículo realiza una revisión del debate, examinando ambas posturas, su historia, argumentos y puntos críticos. Además, se analiza en qué medida los dos planteamientos son realmente antagónicos, y se revisan las alternativas que se han propuesto para su integración. Las conclusiones de esta revisión crítica muestran que, pese a las diferencias, los modelos basados en rasgos y las modernas propuestas socialcognitivas presentan semejanzas nada triviales, lo cual abre puertas a la integración. La psicología de la personalidad debe contemplar un amplio rango de unidades (de las más estáticas a las más cambiantes), y para ello los modelos multinivel suponen una interesante opción
One of the more pervasive controversies in personality psychology deals with the units needed to define the discipline. The problem was posed by G.W. Allport some decades ago; then, it was widely discussed during the consistency crisis, and now, it seems to arise again, with two confronted proposals: trait models (particularly, the Five Factor Model) and socicognitive models. This paper reviews the debate, examining both positions, their history, statements and critical points. The paper also discusses to what extent the two proposals are actually antagonistic, and reviews the integrative options. This critical review concludes that, in spite of the differences, trait-based and sociocognitive models show non-trivial similarities, which open doors to integration. Personality psychology should look at a wide variety of units (from the most static to the most mutable), and, for that reason, multilevel models are shown as an interesting option
One of the more pervasive controversies in personality psychology deals with the units needed to define the discipline. The problem was posed by G.W. Allport some decades ago; then, it was widely discussed during the consistency crisis, and now, it seems to arise again, with two confronted proposals: trait models (particularly, the Five Factor Model) and socicognitive models. This paper reviews the debate, examining both positions, their history, statements and critical points. The paper also discusses to what extent the two proposals are actually antagonistic, and reviews the integrative options. This critical review concludes that, in spite of the differences, trait-based and sociocognitive models show non-trivial similarities, which open doors to integration. Personality psychology should look at a wide variety of units (from the most static to the most mutable), and, for that reason, multilevel models are shown as an interesting option
Description
Bibliographic citation
Romero, E. ¿Qué unidades debemos emplear? Las “dos disciplinas” de la psicología de la personalidad. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 21(2), 244-258. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/26841
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/26841Sponsors
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International








