Assessment of validity and comparison of two spanish versions of the geriatric depression scale
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Abstract
Introduction: The Geriatric Depression Scale is an instrument used to identify
depression in people of an older age. The original English version of this scale has
been translated into Spanish (GDS-VE); two shorter versions of 5- (GDS-5) and
15-items (GDS-15) have been developed.
Aim of the study: To assess the validity and compare the 5- and 15-item Spanish
versions of the GDS among the Spanish population.
Materials and methods: 573 Galicia residents aged >50 years participated in this
study. The following instruments were applied: the 19-item Control, Autonomy, Self-
Realization and Pleasure scale, the Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire,
the Mini-Mental State Examination test, the GDS-5, and the GDS-15.
Results: We found differences in total score between GDS-5 and GDS-15
regarding the variable sex. Internal reliability for GDS-5 and GDS-15 was 0.495
and 0.715, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for GDS-5 – with a cut-off value
of 1 – was 0.517 and 0.650, respectively; for GDS-15 – with a cut-off value of 3
points – sensitivity was 0.755 and specificity 0.668. GDS-5 has a ROC curve of
0.617 and GDS-15 of 0.764.
Conclusion: GDS-15, and to a greater extent GDS-5, should be revised or
even reformulated to improve their diagnostic usefulness by choosing higher
discriminative ability items or even include new items with greater sensitivity that
consider currently prevailing psychosocial factors
Description
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
Bugallo-Carrera C, Dosil-Díaz C, Pereiro AX, Anido-Rifón L, Pacheco-Lorenzo M, Fernández-Iglesias MJ and Gandoy-Crego M (2023) Assessment of validity and comparison of two spanish versions of the geriatric depression scale. Front. Psychol. 14:1101886
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101886Sponsors
This work was supported by Grant PID2020-115137RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
Rights
© 2023 Bugallo-Carrera, Dosil-Díaz, Pereiro, Anido-Rifón, Pacheco-Lorenzo, Fernández- Iglesias and Gandoy-Crego. This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)







