Las pruebas de acceso a la Universidad: Un problema que se repite año tras año
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Sevilla
Abstract
En el presente texto se destaca la dimensión conflictiva de la Selectividad Universitaria, Situándola en el marco de un debate sobre su necesidad. Se cuestiona también la responsabilidad exclusiva de las Pruebas de Acceso en el proceso, llamando la atención sobre las condiciones socioculturales en las que se enmarca. Se presenta en esquema, una investigación sobre su capacidad predictora del rendimiento académico en la Universidad. Se concluye que no sirve para seleccionar a los mejores, sino para redistribuir por los centros en función del número de plazas disponibles. Se cuestiona la falta de coordinación académica entre la Universidad y las Enseñanzas Medias. Se denuncia que , como consecuencia, las estrategias de aprendizaje son básicamente academicistas, y de muy bajo nivel intelectual. Por último, tras plantarse qué ocurriría de no existir, se proponen algunas estrategias de cambio en general, además de recomendaciones a los alumnos para desdramatizar el proceso
The aim of this paper is to take account of the conflicting dimension of the University Selection Process and to put in within the framework of analysis of its own necessity. It is also considered the fact of the unique responsability of the Selection Tests during the process and we point at the sociocultural factors where it takes place as a relevant direction of enquiring. A brief analysis of the research carried out on the prediction capacity of these Test about the academic yield at University is also included. From that, we come to the point that is no useful at all as a selection process of the best candidates but it simply works as a redistribution tool of the number of available posts whitin the different university centers. We also pose the question of the lack of academic coordination between University and Pre-university levels. It is argued that, in consequence, learning strategies are basically of an academic style and with a very low intelectually level of performance. Lastly, after considering the possibility and consequences of the absence of these Tests, we make a proposal of a few general strategies for a change along with some recomendations for students to take into account in order to avoid dramatizing the process
The aim of this paper is to take account of the conflicting dimension of the University Selection Process and to put in within the framework of analysis of its own necessity. It is also considered the fact of the unique responsability of the Selection Tests during the process and we point at the sociocultural factors where it takes place as a relevant direction of enquiring. A brief analysis of the research carried out on the prediction capacity of these Test about the academic yield at University is also included. From that, we come to the point that is no useful at all as a selection process of the best candidates but it simply works as a redistribution tool of the number of available posts whitin the different university centers. We also pose the question of the lack of academic coordination between University and Pre-university levels. It is argued that, in consequence, learning strategies are basically of an academic style and with a very low intelectually level of performance. Lastly, after considering the possibility and consequences of the absence of these Tests, we make a proposal of a few general strategies for a change along with some recomendations for students to take into account in order to avoid dramatizing the process
Description
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
Trillo Alonso, F., & Rodicio García, M. L. (1992). Las pruebas de acceso a la universidad: un problema que se repite año tras año. Revista de Enseñanza Universitaria (REU), Número extra 1992., 63-73
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
https://institucional.us.es/revistas/universitaria/extra/art_6.pdfSponsors
Rights
Copyright © 1992 Universidad de Sevilla. Este trabajo se distribuye bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional"








