‘Because of its size, it’s not worth it!’: The viability of small-scale geographical indication schemes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier
Metrics
Google Scholar
lacobus
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

We analyse the theoretical tenets underpinning geographical indications (GIs) and seek to determine whether the number of producers engaged in them matters. To do so, we develop a qualitative methodology to focus on two small-scale cheese productions located in mountain areas endowed with a GI: Cebreiro (Galicia, NW Spain) and Tolminc (Slovenia). In both instances, just two dairies actively produce the GI-certified cheeses; yet, the two case studies differ greatly. In Cebreiro, the GI is seen as an opportunity for development, but the scant number of producers compromises its sustainability. In Tolminc, the GI is monopolised by one company and offers few benefits for the many disengaged producers throughout the region. We conclude that the number of producers engaged in a GI scheme is not a critical factor in their success; rather, public institutional support and the presence/absence of a GI producers’ management structure are pivotal.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Boga, R. y Paül, V. (2023). ‘Because of its size, it’s not worth it!’: The viability of small-scale geographical indication schemes. Food Policy, 121, 102549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102549

Relation

Has part

Has version

Is based on

Is part of

Is referenced by

Is version of

Requires

Sponsors

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Universities [grant number FPU19/00810] and the European Union's H2020-MCSA-RISE HIGHLANDS.3 project [grant number 872328].

Rights

©2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

Collections