Comparison between transrectal palpation, B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography to assess luteal function in Holstein cattle

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Patoloxía Animal
dc.contributor.authorYáñez, Uxía
dc.contributor.authorMurillo, Antonio V.
dc.contributor.authorBecerra González, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Herradón, Pedro José
dc.contributor.authorPeña Martínez, Ana Isabel
dc.contributor.authorQuintela Arias, Luis Ángel
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T08:42:50Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T08:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-04
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Over the years, the most common methods for monitoring reproductive health in cattle have varied from transrectal palpation to B-mode ultrasonography. Nowadays, some portable ultrasound equipment includes the Doppler mode. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of the different methods to assess corpus luteum (CL) functionality. Methods: In Experiment 1, 53 Holstein lactating cows undergoing a synchronization protocol were examined via transrectal palpation and B-mode scanning. Measurements for the largest diameter (LAD) and subjective size of CL (SCLS) were collected. Data were analyzed using correlation analysis and ROC Curves. In Experiment 2, 30 Holstein non-lactating cows with a CL were administered PGF2α and examined several times after injection, first in B-mode and then with Power Doppler. Measurements for LAD, CL area (CLA) and subjective and objective CL blood flow were collected. Blood samples were taken in both experiments to determine P4 concentration. Data were analyzed using correlation analysis and the GLM repeated measures test. Results: Results for Experiment 1 showed that LAD was more accurate than SCLS. In Experiment 2, CLA was the best measurement to assess CL function, although both subjective and objective CL blood flow offer accurate information 24 h after PGF2α administration. Discussion: Consequently, ultrasonography provides more accurate information about CL function than transrectal palpation. Although CLA seems to be an earlier indicator of luteal function than blood flow, 24 h after the onset of luteolysis, both parameters are valid.
dc.identifier.citationYáñez U, Murillo AV, Becerra JJ, Herradón PG, Peña AI and Quintela LA (2023) Comparison between transrectal palpation, B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography to assess luteal function in Holstein cattle. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1162589. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1162589
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fvets.2023.1162589
dc.identifier.essn2297-1769
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/38973
dc.journal.titleFrontiers in Veterinary Science
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1162589
dc.rights© 2023 Yáñez, Murillo, Becerra, Herradón, Peña and Quintela. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.titleComparison between transrectal palpation, B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography to assess luteal function in Holstein cattle
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number10
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf68ec9ff-9257-4938-a079-83535b714a92
relation.isAuthorOfPublication31f5f7a1-42af-4131-b1f9-238f9d1b15e9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication53866ec7-2efa-489d-aba0-6006454f4c1e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication6eb02ec2-b3db-43c3-b4f4-e7eea5a4b2f4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication57ec282e-f2ed-4fb1-95b8-a06a89fb1f27
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryf68ec9ff-9257-4938-a079-83535b714a92

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
fvets-10-1162589.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format