Salivary biomarkers for cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radioloxía, Saúde Pública, Enfermaría e Medicina
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Cirurxía e Especialidades Médico-Cirúrxicas
dc.contributor.authorRapado González, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Reglero, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorSalgado-Barreira, Ángel
dc.contributor.authorTakkouche, Bahi
dc.contributor.authorLópez López, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorSuárez Cunqueiro, María Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorMuinelo-Romay, Laura
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-13T12:47:52Z
dc.date.available2025-11-13T12:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-11
dc.description.abstractBackground: Saliva represents a promising non-invasive source of novel biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis cancer. This meta-analysis evaluates the diagnostic value of salivary biomarkers for detection of malignant non-oral tumours to better define the value of saliva as an alternative liquid biopsy. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, LILACS and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify articles that examined the potential of salivary biomarkers for the diagnosis of malignant non-oral tumours. To assess the overall accuracy, we calculated the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) using a random- or fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: One hundred fifty-five study units from 29 articles with 11,153 subjects were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.76 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.74–0.77), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75–0.77), 3.22 (95% CI, 2.92–3.55), 0.31 (95% CI, 0.28–0.34), 13.42 (95% CI, 12.28–15.96) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.84–0.87), respectively. Conclusion: Salivary biomarkers may be potentially used for non-invasive diagnosis of malignant non-oral tumours.
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.identifier.citationRapado-González, Ó., Martínez-Reglero, C., Salgado-Barreira, Á., Takkouche, B., López-López, R., Suárez-Cunqueiro, M. M., & Muinelo-Romay, L. (2020). Salivary biomarkers for cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Annals of Medicine, 52(3–4), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2020.1730431
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/07853890.2020.1730431
dc.identifier.essn1365-2060
dc.identifier.issn0785-3890
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/43762
dc.issue.number3-4
dc.journal.titleAnnals of Medicine
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2020.1730431
dc.rights©2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectsaliva
dc.subjectsalivary biomarkers
dc.subjectsalivaomics
dc.subjectcancer
dc.subjectdiagnosis
dc.subjectliquid biopsy
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.titleSalivary biomarkers for cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number52
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication40af4d87-30ed-49b7-b0f8-1cbbda71e01e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication379cc913-eaca-4c1b-a99a-6e686435238d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication192571e0-bfb5-41d1-a68c-568dbde0a7ef
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery40af4d87-30ed-49b7-b0f8-1cbbda71e01e

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6. Annals of Medicine 2020.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format