Un análisis jurisprudencial sobre la figura del indefinido no fijo en la Administración Pública española
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Authors
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
La contratación del personal laboral por tiempo determinado en fraude de ley
y la imposibilidad de la adquisición de fijeza en el ámbito de la contratación pública ha
abocado a la creación jurisprudencial del ‘indefinido no fijo’, a finales de la última década del
siglo XX. Ello se debe a la existencia de una concurrencia conflictiva entre la protección que
otorga el ET al trabajador y los principios constitucionales y legales que rigen el acceso al
empleo público.
La falta de regulación normativa y las peculiaridades que caracterizan a esta figura hacen
que los trabajadores a los que se les ha atribuido tal condición se hallen en un contexto de
inseguridad jurídica. Por esta razón, en el presente estudio se indaga en la ordenación jurídica
que les resulta aplicable, así como en las similitudes y diferencias de su régimen jurídico
respecto de otro tipo de trabajadores que prestan sus servicios para la Administración Pública
española. El objetivo es centrar la atención en los puntos más controvertidos del referido
régimen, especialmente desde la perspectiva jurisprudencial y doctrinal, con la idea de
avanzar en el análisis de la figura desde su conformación inicial hasta la actualidad.
The labour staff hiring’s for a specific period of time using fraudulent methods and the impossibility of acquiring a permanent contract in the field of public contracting has led to the jurisprudential development of the ‘indefinite not fixed’ at the end of the last decade of the 20th century. This is due to the existence of a conflicting concurrence between the protection granted by the ET to the worker and the constitutional and legal principles governing access to public employment. The lack of normative regulation and the peculiarities that characterise this figure mean that the workers to whom such status has been attributed find themselves in a context of legal uncertainty. For this reason, this study investigates the legal arrangement that is applicable to them, as well as the similarities and differences of their legal regime compared to other types of workers who provide their services for the Spanish Public Administration. The objective is to focus attention on the most controversial points of the referred regime, especially from the jurisprudential and doctrinal perspective, with the idea of advancing in the analysis of the figure from its initial formation to the present.
The labour staff hiring’s for a specific period of time using fraudulent methods and the impossibility of acquiring a permanent contract in the field of public contracting has led to the jurisprudential development of the ‘indefinite not fixed’ at the end of the last decade of the 20th century. This is due to the existence of a conflicting concurrence between the protection granted by the ET to the worker and the constitutional and legal principles governing access to public employment. The lack of normative regulation and the peculiarities that characterise this figure mean that the workers to whom such status has been attributed find themselves in a context of legal uncertainty. For this reason, this study investigates the legal arrangement that is applicable to them, as well as the similarities and differences of their legal regime compared to other types of workers who provide their services for the Spanish Public Administration. The objective is to focus attention on the most controversial points of the referred regime, especially from the jurisprudential and doctrinal perspective, with the idea of advancing in the analysis of the figure from its initial formation to the present.
Description
Bibliographic citation
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Sponsors
Rights
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional



