Coblator adenoidectomy in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art review

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radioloxía, Saúde Pública, Enfermaría e Medicinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCalvo-Henriquez, Christian
dc.contributor.authorFernández Rueda, María del Pino
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Lliberos, Ainhoa
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado-Alvarado, Byron
dc.contributor.authorMota-Rojas, Xenia
dc.contributor.authorManiaci, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorIannella, Giannicola
dc.contributor.authorJimenez-Huerta, Ignacio
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T13:24:58Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T13:24:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-26
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Adenoid hypertrophy is one of the main causes of nasal obstruction in ‘children. Adenoid hypertrophy can be approached either with nasal corticosteroids, or surgically when medical treatment fails. Different adenoidectomy techniques have been proposed to reduce morbidity and surgical risks, with a consequent marked increase in the use of new surgical procedures in recent years, with a progressive increase in the use of coblation. This state-of-the-art review aims to systematically review the current literature on the role of coblation in adenoidectomy. Methods The selection criteria included children submitted to adenoidectomy with coblator vs other techniques. 11 research questions were defined. 4 databases were explored by four authors: PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and SciELO. The level of evidence and quality of the selected articles were assessed according to assessed according to the Quality Assessment Checklist of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Results 20 studies met the inclusion criteria: 2 metanalysis, 12 randomized clinical trial, 2 non-randomized clinical trial, 1 prospective cohort study, and 3 retrospective cohort study. It encompassed a total population of 8375 participants. Regarding the different surgical techniques, 18 studies (excluding metanalysis) performed coblation (n = 1550), 6 microdebridement (n = 883), 15 curettage (n = 4016), and 1 suction coagulation (n = 1926). Conclusion Coblator adenoidectomy appears to offer better adenoid control compared to curettage, with a possible, although not confirmed lower rate of revision surgery. Similarly, this greater resection of adenoid tissue seems to be related to a greater reduction of nasal obstruction. The advantages of this technique are mainly less surgical bleeding—although it is not clear this is a clinically relevant difference, and less postoperative pain compared to cold curettage. The difference in pain is small, as adenoidectomy is not a painful surgery in general. There is little evidence on the control of OME and comparison with other techniques such as microdebrider adenoidectomyes_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (2023) 280:4339–4349es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-023-08094-7
dc.identifier.essn1434-4726
dc.identifier.issn0937-4477
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/31204
dc.issue.number10
dc.journal.titleEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.page.final4349
dc.page.initial4339
dc.publisherSpringeres_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-08094-7es_ES
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were madees_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectAdenoidectomy es_ES
dc.subjectAdenotonsillectomy es_ES
dc.subjectCoblation es_ES
dc.subjectCoblator es_ES
dc.subjectPower-assisted adenoidectomyes_ES
dc.titleCoblator adenoidectomy in pediatric patients: a state-of-the-art reviewes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.volume.number280
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2023_eaoorl_calvo_coblattor.pdf
Size:
448.45 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artigo de investigación