Gender dynamics in work stress intervention research over 47 years: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Despite increasing attention to gender disparities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields, little is known about how these dynamics manifest within interdisciplinary public health domains such as Occupational Safety and Health (OSH). This study presents a bibliometric analysis of 144 empirical publications on work-related stress management interventions published between 1977 and 2023. Drawing from five major academic databases, we examine gender differences in authorship patterns, scientific productivity, citation impact, and collaboration patterns, with a focus on first, corresponding, and last authorship as indicators of contribution and leadership. Our findings reveal a significant increase in women’s participation over time, particularly in first authorship roles, while a persistent gender gap in senior and supervisory positions favors male researchers, in line with the leaky pipeline framework. Productivity, citation rates, and cooperation patterns suggest positive trends toward gender equity, though subtle structural disparities remain. We discuss implications for inclusive research environments, equitable authorship recognition, and the design of gender-sensitive science policy in occupational health. This study contributes to understanding the gendered contours of scientific influence within OSH and highlights the need for more inclusive academic ecosystems.