Partial volume correction in longitudinal tau PET studies: is it really needed?

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Background [18F]flortaucipir (FTP) tau PET quantification is known to be affected by non-specific binding in off-target regions. Although partial volume correction (PVC) techniques partially account for this effect, their inclusion may also introduce noise and variability into the quantification process. While the impact of these effects has been studied in cross-sectional designs, the benefits and drawbacks of PVC on longitudinal FTP studies is still under scrutiny. The aim of this work was to study the performance of the most common PVC techniques for longitudinal FTP imaging. Methods A cohort of 247 individuals from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative with concurrent baseline FTP-PET, amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET and structural MRI, as well as with follow-up FTP-PET and MRI were included in the study. FTP-PET scans were corrected for partial volume effects using Meltzer's, a simple and popular analytical PVC, and both the region-based voxel-wise (RBV) and the iterative Yang (iY) corrections. FTP SUVR values and their longitudinal rates of change were calculated for regions of interest (ROI) corresponding to Braak Areas I-VI, for a temporal meta-ROI and for regions typically displaying off-target FTP binding (caudate, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, choroid plexus, hemispheric white matter, cerebellar white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid). The longitudinal correlation between binding in off-target and target ROIs was analysed for the different PVCs. Additionally, group differences in longitudinal FTP SUVR rates of change between Aβ-negative (A-) and Aβ-positive (A+), and between cognitively unimpaired (CU) and cognitively impaired (CI) individuals, were studied. Finally, we compared the ability of different partial-volume-corrected baseline FTP SUVRs to predict longitudinal brain atrophy and cognitive decline. Results Among off-target ROIs, hemispheric white matter showed the highest correlation with longitudinal FTP SUVR rates from cortical target ROIs (R2=0.28–0.82), with CSF coming in second (R2=0.28–0.42). Application of voxel-wise PVC techniques minimized this correlation, with RBV performing best (R2=0.00–0.07 for hemispheric white matter). PVC also increased group differences between CU and CI individuals in FTP SUVR rates of change across all target regions, with RBV again performing best (No PVC: Cohen's d = 0.26–0.66; RBV: Cohen's d = 0.43–0.74). These improvements were not observed for differentiating A- from A+ groups. Additionally, voxel-wise PVC techniques strengthened the correlation between baseline FTP SUVR and longitudinal grey matter atrophy and cognitive decline. Conclusion Quantification of longitudinal FTP SUVR rates of change is affected by signal from off-target regions, especially the hemispheric white matter and the CSF. Voxel-wise PVC techniques significantly reduce this effect. PVC provided a significant but modest benefit for tasks involving the measurement of group-level longitudinal differences. These findings are particularly relevant for the estimations of sample sizes and analysis methodologies of longitudinal group studies.

Description

Bibliographic citation

NeuroImage Volume 289, 1 April 2024, 120537

Relation

Has part

Has version

Is based on

Is part of

Is referenced by

Is version of

Requires

Sponsors

The project that gave rise to these results received the support of a fellowship from “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434). The fellowship code is LCF/BQ/DR20/11790012. This work is partly funded by the public projects funded by ERDF: PI19/01315 (ISCIII) and EAPA_791/2018 NeuroATLANTIC (UE Interreg). Jesús Silva-Rodríguez is a Sara Borrell fellow (CD21/00067). MJG is supported by the "Miguel Servet" program (CP19/00031) and a research grant (PI20/00613) of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (ISCIII-FEDER). MS is supported by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine; KAW2014.0363), the Swedish Research Council (2017–02869 2021–02678 and 2021–06545), the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the County Councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-813971 and ALFGBG-965326), the Swedish Brain Foundation (FO2021–0311) and the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation (AF-740191).

Rights

© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an opena ccess article under the CC BY-NC license
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International