Díaz‐Rodríguez, A.Limeres Posse, JacoboAlbuquerque, R.Brailo, V.Cook, R.Fricain, J. C.Lodi, G.Monteiro, L.Silva, L.Carey, B.Diniz Freitas, Márcio2023-11-132023-11-132023-07-23Oral Diseases, 00, 1–131354-523Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/31263Objective The aim of this study was to assess the quality of free-to-access videos on oral biopsy procedures on the YouTube platform. Materials and Methods We conducted a search on YouTube using the term “oral biopsy” and selected the first 100 videos in order of relevance. The following exclusion criteria were applied: language other than English, videos that did not cover oral biopsy techniques, videos on nonhuman specimens, postoperative instructions, personal experiences, exfoliative cytology, or “brush biopsy.” Forty-seven selected videos were classified based on their duration, country of origin, date of upload to the system, author, information source and number of views, and likes and dislikes. Video quality was analyzed using DISCERN, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and the Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI). Results The majority (78.7%) of analyzed videos were uploaded by dentists, originating from India (48.9%), with a mean duration of 11.8 min (SD, 20.4), with 104.5 likes (SD, 186.4) and 7.1 dislikes (SD, 10.55). The mean values for DISCERN, GQS, and VIQI were 1.3 (SD, 0.52), 2.1 (SD, 1.04), and 9.62 (SD, 1.69), respectively. Conclusion The majority of videos on oral biopsy published on YouTube are of low qualityeng© 2023 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are madeAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Dental educationOral biopsyYouTubejournal article10.1111/odi.146901601-0825open access