Paül Carril, ValeriàBoga González, Rubén2024-02-092024-02-092023-11Boga, R. y Paül, V. (2023). ‘Because of its size, it’s not worth it!’: The viability of small-scale geographical indication schemes. Food Policy, 121, 102549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102549http://hdl.handle.net/10347/32667We analyse the theoretical tenets underpinning geographical indications (GIs) and seek to determine whether the number of producers engaged in them matters. To do so, we develop a qualitative methodology to focus on two small-scale cheese productions located in mountain areas endowed with a GI: Cebreiro (Galicia, NW Spain) and Tolminc (Slovenia). In both instances, just two dairies actively produce the GI-certified cheeses; yet, the two case studies differ greatly. In Cebreiro, the GI is seen as an opportunity for development, but the scant number of producers compromises its sustainability. In Tolminc, the GI is monopolised by one company and offers few benefits for the many disengaged producers throughout the region. We conclude that the number of producers engaged in a GI scheme is not a critical factor in their success; rather, public institutional support and the presence/absence of a GI producers’ management structure are pivotal.eng©2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Geographical indicationsRural developmentMonopolyGovernanceMountain54 Geografía‘Because of its size, it’s not worth it!’: The viability of small-scale geographical indication schemesjournal article10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102549open access