Seijas Naya, FlavioBernabeu Mira, Juan C.Pérez Jardón, AlbaConde Amboage, MercedesPeñarrocha Oltra, DavidCamacho Alonso, FabioPérez-Sayáns García, Mario2026-03-162026-03-162025-12-30Seijas Naya, F., J. C. Bernabeu Mira, A. Pérez Jardón, et al. 2025. “ Influence of Abutment Shape on Implant Marginal Bone Remodeling: A Double-Blind, Randomized 24-Month Clinical Study.” Clinical Oral Implants Research 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70085https://hdl.handle.net/10347/46399Objective This study follows a 2-year evaluation to verify marginal bone remodeling (MBR) trends associated with different abutment designs. Methods A balanced, randomised, double-blind clinical trial with two parallel experimental arms. 68 implants were placed in 9 men and 12 women, 48.5% using the straight abutment and 51.5% the concave abutment. The primary variable was peri-implant tissue stability, measured by marginal bone loss (MBL) or gain (MBG) through digital radiology. Mixed linear regression models and Additive Generalized Additive Models were constructed to estimate MBR, simultaneously considering the variables abutment height, group, and time. Results At 24 months, linear mixed-effects regression models revealed that the concave abutment group exhibited significantly less MBL than the straight abutment group across mesial, distal, and average measurements (p = 0.006–0.026). Significant interactions between abutment type and time at 8 weeks and 6 months suggest early and sustained benefits of the concave design. At 24 months, this effect remained significant except in the mesial model (p = 0.072). Abutment height was positively associated with MBL, particularly in the straight group; however, in the concave group, greater height mitigated bone loss (p < 0.01). Conclusion Concave abutments demonstrated a potential advantage in reducing early marginal bone loss and promoting mid-term bone stability compared to straight abutments. Their design may enhance soft tissue adaptation, contributing to improved peri-implant bone preservation. While increased abutment height showed a protective effect in the concave group, these findings require confirmation. Further long-term studies are warranted to validate these results and clarify their clinical relevance.eng© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/journal article10.1111/clr.700851600-0501open access