Letter to the editor regarding Collard et al. (2023): “Persistence and mobility (defined as organic-carbon partitioning) do not correlate to the detection of substances found in surface and groundwater: Criticism of the regulatory concept of persistent and mobile substances”

Arp, Hans Peter H.Wolf, RaoulHale, Sarah E.Baskaran, SivaniGlüge, JulianeScheringer, MartinTrier, XeniaCousins, Ian T.Timmer, HarrieHofman-Caris, RobertaLennquist, AnnaBannink, André D.Stroomberg, Gerard J.Montes Goyanes, RosaRodil Rodríguez, María del RosarioQuintana Álvarez, José BenitoZahn, DanielGallard, HervéMohr, TobiasSchliebner, IvoNeumann, Michael2023-11-082023-07-31Arp et al. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 165927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165927http://hdl.handle.net/10347/31221engThis manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/PMT and vPvMCLP regulationWater protectionDrinking waterLetter to the editor regarding Collard et al. (2023): “Persistence and mobility (defined as organic-carbon partitioning) do not correlate to the detection of substances found in surface and groundwater: Criticism of the regulatory concept of persistent and mobile substances”journal article10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165927open access