RT Journal Article
T1 Direct versus iterative methods for forward-backward diffusion equations. Numerical comparisons
A1 López Pouso, Óscar
A1 Jumaniyazov, Nizomjon
K1 Forward–backward partial differential equation
K1 Two-way partial differential equation
K1 Finite difference method
K1 Fokker–Planck equation
K1 Direct method
K1 Iterative method
AB By far, the standard implementation of finite difference schemes for forward–backward partial differential equations consists in employing an iterative method. This paper collects a series of numerical results which demonstrate that a direct implementation can reduce the computing time. An effective way of choosing the seed for the iterative method naturally arises.
PB Springer
SN 2281-7875
YR 2021
FD 2021-01-06
LK https://hdl.handle.net/10347/38253
UL https://hdl.handle.net/10347/38253
LA eng
NO López Pouso, Ó., & Jumaniyazov, N. (2021). Direct versus iterative methods for forward-backward diffusion equations. Numerical comparisons. SeMA Journal, 78(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40324-020-00236-9
NO This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40324-020-00236-9
NO This work was co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Xunta de Galicia under the GRC2013-014 grant, and by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities under the MTM2017-86459-R grant.
DS Minerva
RD 27 abr 2026