RT Journal Article
T1 Competencias en el uso de pruebas en argumentación
T2 Competencies in the use of evidence in argumentation
A1 Bravo Torija, Beatriz
A1 Puig Mauriz, Blanca
A1 Jiménez Aleixandre, María Pilar
K1 Argumentation
K1 Scientific competence
K1 Metaknowlege
K1 Use of evidence
AB The relevance of the competence in the use of scientific evidence in argumentation is discussedin the context of its prominence in PISA and policy. The paper outlines a proposal of twodimensions of the competence: (1) metaknowledge, or knowledge about the use of evidence,including nature of evidence, its role, and criteria for evaluating evidence; and (2) practice ofthe use of evidence, including the use of evidence in different contexts and the operationsinvolved in it. The different elements in the proposal are discussed drawing from the literature,and particularly from the authors’ studies with two tasks set in socio-scientific contexts:evaluation of Watson’s claim about differences in intelligence between ‘races’, and decisionabout the ecological efficiency of eating secondary versus tertiary carnivore fish. The difficultiesfound, both in secondary school and in university students, point to the need to pay specificattention to this dimension of argumentation
PB Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Facultad de Química
SN 0187-893X
YR 2009
FD 2009
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10347/20597
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10347/20597
LA spa
NO Bravo, Beatriz, Puig, Blanca, & Jiménez-Aleixandre, María Pilar. (2009). Competencias en el uso de pruebas en argumentación. Educación química, 20(2), 137-142
NO Trabajo parte del proyecto código SEJ2006-15589-C02-01/EDUC, financiado por el Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia(MEC) de España, y parcialmente con fondos FEDER (FondoEuropeo de Desarrollo Regional). El trabajo de Beatriz Bravoestá financiado por una beca FPI del MEC, código BES-2007-15075, y el de Blanca Puig por un convenio con el Consellode Cultura Galega, código 2008/CI78
DS Minerva
RD 26 abr 2026