RT Journal Article
T1 Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion before subthalamic deep brain stimulation: a prospective, comparative study in 20 patients
A1 Fernández Pajarín, Gustavo
A1 Sesar Ignacio, Ángel
A1 Ares Pensado, Begoña
A1 Jiménez Martín, Isabel
A1 Gelabert González, Miguel
A1 Arán Echabe, Eduardo
A1 Relova Quinteiro, José Luis
A1 Castro  García, Alfonso
K1 Parkinson’s disease
K1 Subthalamic deep brain stimulation
K1 Apomorphine
K1 Device-aided therapies
AB Background: Background Studies comparing the clinical efficacy of apomorphine infusion (APO) with subsequent subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) in advanced Parkinson’s disease (aPD) are currently lacking. Retrospective data have shown that patients treated with APO are usually older, have a more prolonged disease, and a more severe phenotype.Objective: Objective To compare the benefit of APO with that of STN-DBS on motor, non-motor, cognitive, and quality of life in the same patient when given sequentially.Methods: Methods We prospectively analyzed 20 aPD patients over 3 different treatment phases: baseline (optimized medical treatment), during APO treatment, and during subsequent STN-DBS treatment. The APO and STN-DBS phases were stable for 6 months, and evaluation of the different treatments was separated by 6 months. Results: Results Compared to baseline, APO, and STN-DBS reduced mean daily off time by 70.5% and 89.3% (P = 0.012), respectively, and scores for Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) IV by 27.5% and 80.5% (P ≤ 0.001), Non-motor symptoms scale (NMSS) by 24.6% and 49.3% (P ≤ 0.001), Montgomery Asberg depression scale (MADRS) by 7.4% and 39.0% (P = 0.27), Starkstein apathy scale (SAS) by 51.1% and 39.9% (P = 0.734), Parkinson’s disease sleep scale 2 (PDSS-2) by 25.7% and 56.7% (P ≤ 0.001), and Parkinson’s disease questionnaire 39 item (PDQ-39) by 39.6% and 64.9% (P ≤ 0.001). Global cognition did not change with either therapy, but phonetic fluency worsened after STN-DBS compared to APO (P = 0.022).Conclusions: Conclusions Both APO and STN-DBS improved motor and non-motor symptoms and quality of life compared to optimized medical treatment in aPD. Overall, STN-DBS was the most effective treatment, but APO showed a pronounced benefit on motor symptoms. Effective treatment for aPD should not be delayed, even when waiting for surgery.
PB Wiley
YR 2021
FD 2021
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10347/29088
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10347/29088
LA eng
NO Movement Disorders Clinical Practice 2021; 8(8): 1216–1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.13338
DS Minerva
RD 24 abr 2026