Periodontal response to a tricalcium silicate material or resin composite placed in close contact to the supracrestal tissue attachment: a histomorphometric comparative study

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Anatomía, Produción Animal e Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Cirurxía e Especialidades Médico-Cirúrxicas
dc.contributor.authorCastelo Baz, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorArgibay Lorenzo, Olalla
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Guzón, Fernando María
dc.contributor.authorMartín Biedma, Benjamín
dc.contributor.authorDarriba, Iria L.
dc.contributor.authorMiguéns Vila, Ramón
dc.contributor.authorRamos Barbosa, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorLópez Peña, Mónica
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Carrión, Juan
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-28T07:38:54Z
dc.date.available2026-01-28T07:38:54Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionThis version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03876-x
dc.description.abstractObjective: Subgingival dental restorations and periodontal health have been studied for many years; however, there is a low histological evidence on the behavior of new materials in the supracrestal tissue attachment. The aim of this study is to analyze the periodontal response when a tricalcium silicate material (TSM) or composite margin restorations is placed to 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm from the bone crest with a histomorphometric analysis in dogs. Methods: Nine mongrel dogs were used in this study: four dogs (8 canine teeth) for TSM group, 4 dogs (8 canine teeth) for composite group, and 1 dog (2 canine teeth) with cavities without restorations. Cavity preparation of 2×2×1 mm was created on the buccal aspect of the canines at 0.5 and 1.5 mm of the crestal bone. Cavities were restored with composite and TSM or were left unrestored as control. After 12 weeks of healing, the dogs were euthanized and blocks containing the tooth and soft tissues were processed. Results: In all the specimens, the junction epithelium was stablished apical to the tooth preparations. A shorter distance to the bone (0.5 cavity) implies greater apical periodontal migration regardless of the material used. In the TSM groups, the connective tissue height and the distance between bone level and apical margin preparation were greater than those in the composite groups, while the epithelium height was less. However, there were no statistically significant differences comparing TSM and composite groups at either 0.5 mm or 1.5 mm (p > 0.05) Conclusion: Histologic analysis did not show periodontal reattachment to TSM or composite. In both cases, bone crest migrates apically. For that reason, it is recommended to perform composite restorations at the subgingival level whenever the distance to the bone crest is at least 2 mm. Clinical relevance: Both composite and TSM do not achieve reinsertion of the connective tissue in the biological width.
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.identifier.citationCastelo-Baz P, Argibay-Lorenzo O, Muñoz F, Martin-Biedma B, Darriba IL, Miguéns-Vila R, Ramos-Barbosa I, López-Peña M, Blanco-Carrión J. Periodontal response to a tricalcium silicate material or resin composite placed in close contact to the supracrestal tissue attachment: a histomorphometric comparative study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5743-5753. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03876-x
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-021-03876-x
dc.identifier.essn1436-3771
dc.identifier.issn1432-698
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/45490
dc.journal.titleClinical Oral Investigations
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final5753
dc.page.initial5743
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag GmbH Germany
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03876-x
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectComposite
dc.subjectDeep margin
dc.subjectHealing
dc.subjectHistology
dc.subjectSupracrestal tissue attachment
dc.subjectTricalcium silicate material
dc.subject.classificationInvestigación
dc.titlePeriodontal response to a tricalcium silicate material or resin composite placed in close contact to the supracrestal tissue attachment: a histomorphometric comparative study
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number25
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication55f8b356-536d-479c-b1d6-c49a5584f4ef
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa80b7053-e349-4aaa-9aa0-fe8dc7043ac2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication338c6e4f-e09f-42f4-aaf7-5add4c21df2b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication840bdd31-d439-4626-9073-4b0703cd282f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc9600044-1fe5-47f4-a28f-ae91200c1485
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery55f8b356-536d-479c-b1d6-c49a5584f4ef

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021_coi_castelo_periodontal.pdf
Size:
283.95 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format