Interference of Cellular Phone Conversations with Visuomotor Tasks: An ERP Study

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica e Psicobioloxíagl
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Larrea, Luis
dc.contributor.authorPerchet, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorPerrin, Fabien
dc.contributor.authorAmenedo Losada, María Elena
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-30T10:37:33Z
dc.date.available2020-07-30T10:37:33Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.descriptionThis version of the article may not completely replicate the final authoritative version published in Journal of Psychophysiology at https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.15.1.14. It is not the version of record and is therefore not suitable for citation. Please do not copy or cite without the permission of the author(s)gl
dc.description.abstractThe use of mobile phones has been shown to increase drivers’ reaction times (RTs), but whether this results from interference with attention, stimulus identification, or response production remains unclear. We recorded RTs and event-related brain potentials (ERPs) reflecting speed of stimulus processing, attentional allocation, and preparedness to respond during a visual reaction task performed with or without the concomitant use of a mobile phone, in either “hands-free” or “phone-in-hand” operating modes. As expected, maintaining a phone conversation increased RTs to visual targets, this effect being associated with complex ERP effects. Phone conversations did not appear to delay target detection times, as assessed by N2–P3 latencies, but did significantly decrease stimulus-induced alerting and attentional allocation (P3 amplitude) and interfered with motor preparation processes (readiness potential). P3 amplitude drop was identical whatever the mode of phone use, while decrease of readiness potential was progressive from the “hands-free” to the “phone-in-hand” condition. These results suggest that two mechanisms contributed to degrade performance in this experiment: first, a general decrease of attention to sensory inputs, characteristic of “dual-task” situations, probably acting through a delay in sensory-motor transfer times. This effect was independent of whether the phone was handled or “hands-free.” Conversely, the second factor was specifically sensitive to manipulation of the phone and caused a weakening of the readiness to respond with a motor act.gl
dc.description.peerreviewedSIgl
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the “MAIF Foundation for Acident Research” (“Fondation MAIF de Recherche sur les Risques Accidentels,” and benefited from discussions with Dr. G. Pachiaudi and A. Chapon, researchers at the INRETS (Institut National sur la Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité)gl
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Larrea, L.; Perchet, C.; Perrin, F.; Amenedo, E.(2001).Interference of cellular phone conversations with visuomotor tasks: An ERP study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15, 14-21. doi: 10.1027//0269-8803.15.1.14gl
dc.identifier.doi10.1027//0269-8803.15.1.14
dc.identifier.essn2151-2124
dc.identifier.issn0269-8803
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/23229
dc.language.isoenggl
dc.publisherHogrefegl
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.15.1.14gl
dc.rights© 2001 Hogrefe Publishinggl
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessgl
dc.subjectAttentiongl
dc.subjectArousalgl
dc.subjectEvent-related potentialsgl
dc.subjectMobile phonesgl
dc.subjectCellular phonesgl
dc.subjectCNVgl
dc.subjectReadiness potentialgl
dc.subjectP3gl
dc.titleInterference of Cellular Phone Conversations with Visuomotor Tasks: An ERP Studygl
dc.typejournal articlegl
dc.type.hasVersionAMgl
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication500c0358-2647-4163-9970-5197d2c99758
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery500c0358-2647-4163-9970-5197d2c99758

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2001_GarciaLarrea_JOfPsychophy_InterferenceOfCellular.pdf
Size:
384.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: