Presence does not imply activity: DNA and RNA patterns differ in response to salt perturbation in anaerobic digestion

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Enxeñaría Químicagl
dc.contributor.areaÁrea de Enxeñaría e Arquitectura
dc.contributor.authorDe Vrieze, Jo
dc.contributor.authorRegueiro Abelleira, Leticia
dc.contributor.authorProps, Ruben
dc.contributor.authorVilchez Vargas, Ramiro
dc.contributor.authorJáregui, Ruy
dc.contributor.authorPieper, Dietmar H.
dc.contributor.authorLema Rodicio, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCarballa Arcos, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T11:09:34Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T11:09:34Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-20
dc.description.abstractBackground The microbial community in anaerobic digestion is mainly monitored by means of DNA-based methods. This may lead to incorrect interpretation of the community parameters, because microbial abundance does not necessarily reflect activity. In this research, the difference between microbial community response on DNA (total community) and RNA (active community) based on the 16S rRNA (gene) with respect to salt concentration and response time was evaluated. Results The application of higher NaCl concentrations resulted in a decrease in methane production. A stronger and faster response to salt concentration was observed on RNA level. This was reflected in terms of microbial community composition and organization, as richness, evenness, and overall diversity were differentially impacted. A higher divergence of community structure was observed on RNA level as well, indicating that total community composition depends on deterministic processes, while the active community is determined by stochastic processes. Methanosaeta was identified as the most abundant methanogen on DNA level, but its relative abundance decreased on RNA level, related to salt perturbation. Conclusions This research demonstrated the need for RNA-based community screening to obtain reliable information on actual community parameters and to identify key species that determine process stabilitygl
dc.description.peerreviewedSIgl
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and COMPLETE BELGIUM through REWATER project (EU ERANET NEWINDIGO—DST. PRI-PIMNIN-2011-1487). Jo De Vrieze is supported as postdoctoral fellow from the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen). Ruben Props is supported by Ghent University (BOFDOC2015000601) and the Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN). Leticia Regueiro, Juan M. Lema, and Marta Carballa belong to CRETUS (AGRUP2015/02) and to the Galician Competitive Research Group (GRC 2013-032)gl
dc.identifier.citationDe Vrieze, J., Regueiro, L., Props, R., Vilchez-Vargas, R., Jáuregui, R., Pieper, D., Lema, J. and Carballa, M. (2016). Presence does not imply activity: DNA and RNA patterns differ in response to salt perturbation in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 9(1)gl
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13068-016-0652-5
dc.identifier.issn1754-6834
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/15287
dc.language.isoenggl
dc.publisherBioMed Centralgl
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7TB00179Ggl
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2016gl
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessgl
dc.subjectArchaegl
dc.subjectBiogasgl
dc.subjectIllumina sequencinggl
dc.subjectMethanogenesisgl
dc.subjectSalinitygl
dc.subject.classificationMaterias::Investigación::33 Ciencias tecnológicas::3303 ingeniería y tecnología químicasgl
dc.titlePresence does not imply activity: DNA and RNA patterns differ in response to salt perturbation in anaerobic digestiongl
dc.typejournal articlegl
dc.type.hasVersionVoRgl
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9fbac3ef-9f34-48d3-ad2a-afc25f286f08
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf574e8ce-1a88-4045-bc74-d48db358fc70
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9fbac3ef-9f34-48d3-ad2a-afc25f286f08

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Presencedoesnotimply_De_Vrieze_et_al.pdf
Size:
2.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: