Effect of water models on transmembrane self-assembled cyclic peptide nanotubes
Loading...
Identifiers
ISSN: 1936-0851
E-ISSN: 1936-086X
Publication date
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ACS
Abstract
Self-assembling cyclic peptide nanotubes can form nanopores when they are inserted in lipid bilayers, acting as ion and/or water permeable channels. In order to improve the versatility of these systems, it is possible to specifically design cyclic peptides with a combination of natural and non-natural amino acids, enabling the control of the nature of the inner cavity of the channels. Here, the behavior of two types of self-assembling peptide motifs, alternating α-amino acids with γ- or δ-aminocycloalkanecarboxylic acids, is studied via molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The behavior of water molecules in nanopores is expected to affect the properties of these channels and therefore merits detailed examination. A number of water models commonly used in MD simulations have been validated by how well they reproduce bulk water properties. However, it is less clear how these water models behave in the nanoconfined condition inside a channel. The behavior of four different water models—TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, and OPC—are evaluated in MD simulations of self-assembled cyclic peptide nanotubes of distinct composition and diameter. The dynamic behavior of the water molecules and ions in these designed artificial channels depends subtly on the water model used. TIP3P water molecules move faster than those of TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, and OPC. This demeanor is clearly observed in the filling of the nanotube, in water diffusion within the pore, and in the number and stability of hydrogen bonds of the peptides with water. It was also shown that the water model influences the simulated ion flux through the nanotubes, with TIP3P producing the greatest ion flux. Additionally, the two more recent models, TIP4P/2005 and OPC, which are known to reproduce the experimental self-diffusion coefficient of bulk water quite well, exhibit very similar results under the nanoconfined conditions studied here. Because none of these models have been parametrized specifically for waters confined in peptide nanotubes, this study provides a point of reference for further validation
Description
Bibliographic citation
ACS Nano 2021, 15, 4, 7053–7064
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c00155Sponsors
This work was supported by the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) and the ERDF (CTQ2016-78423-R, PID2019-111126RB-100, and RTI2018-098795-A-I00) and by the Xunta de Galicia and the ERDF (ED431F 2020/05, ED431C 2017/25, and Centro singular de investigación de Galicia accreditation 2016-2019, ED431G/09). M.C. thanks Xunta de Galicia for a predoctoral fellowship (ED481A-2017/068). R.G.-F. thanks Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades for a Ramón y Cajal contract (RYC-2016- 20335). Research in MSPS’s group is supported by EPSRC (EP/R004722/1; EP/V010948/1) BBSRC (BB/R00126X/1) and Wellcome Trust (208361/Z/17/Z)
Rights
© 2021 American Chemical Society. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en)
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Atribución 4.0 Internacional








