Comparative evaluation of UV-driven processes for quaternary treatment of urban wastewaters: Trade-offs between micropollutants removal, toxicity reduction, and cost-effectiveness
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Micropollutants (MP) in urban wastewater pose challenges, requiring advanced treatment solutions to ensure regulatory compliance and environmental safety. This study investigated UV-driven processes (UV-alone, UV/H2O2, and UV/PDS) in a FluHelik photoreactor operating in continuous mode (residence times: 1.0–6.5 min) to remove 19 MPs (spiked at 10 μg L−1 each) from urban wastewater after tertiary treatment. Preliminary trials included bench-scale testing and spiked demineralized water. Pilot-scale trials using real wastewater evaluated treatment performance across different UV lamp types: low-pressure (LP), medium-pressure mercury (MP_Hg), and medium-pressure iron-doped (MP_Fe). Treatment performance was assessed regarding MP removal, ecotoxicity (Chlorella vulgaris growth inhibition), and an integrated cost-effectiveness metric (expressed as € m−3 order−1). UV-alone treatments, particularly using medium-pressure lamps, effectively reduced urban wastewater toxicity but showed limited MP removal, especially for EU-prioritized compounds like carbamazepine and irbesartan. UV/H2O2 under MP_Hg lamp provided moderate removal (up to 56 % for 15 MPs) with acceptable operational costs (~0.09 € m−3), but increased post-treatment toxicity. UV/PDS consistently achieved the highest MP removal, namely for carbamazepine (82 %) and irbesartan (81 %), while also reducing effluent toxicity to C. vulgaris. Despite the higher cost of persulfate, UV/PDS proved more cost-effective when both pollutant removal and ecotoxicity were considered. Persistent MPs such as short-chain PFAS and melamine remained largely unaffected by all treatments. This study underscores the need to optimize UV-driven processes by tailoring UV spectra, oxidant choice, and operational conditions to balance contaminant removal, operational costs, and ecotoxicity.
Description
Bibliographic citation
L.M.M.T. Gomes et al. Chemical Engineering Journal 523 (2025) 168528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.168528
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.168528Sponsors
This work was financially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P. /MCTES through national funds: LSRE-LCM, UID/50020/2025; and ALiCE, LA/P/0045/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/LA/P/0045/2020). This research was also co-financed by the European Union through the INTERREG VI A Spain-Portugal Cooperation Program (POCTEP) 2021-2027, under project 0048_BLUE_WWATER_1_E. Authors also want to acknowledge funding provided by the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación – MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (ref. PID2020-117686RB-C32). Lúcio M. M. T. Gomes acknowledges the Ministry of Management and Innovation in Public Services - Brazil. Vítor J.P. Vilar acknowledges the FCT Individual Call to Scientific Employment Stimulus 2017 (CEECIND/01317/2017).
Rights
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International








