Gender Differences in the Development of Children’s Conduct Problems: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer
Metrics
Google Scholar
lacobus
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Gender differences in the trajectories of conduct problems have received very little attention in the literature. The present four-year longitudinal study explores gender differences in conduct problems trajectories through early childhood, assessing gender-specific predictors and outcomes. We identified gender-separated conduct problems trajectories in a sample of 2246 young children (Mage in wave 1 = 4.25; 48.5% girls) using latent class growth analyses. We found five trajectories for girls (i.e., low, average, downward, upward, and stable high) and four for boys (i.e., low, average, stable high, and upward). Low parental warmth was related to the most problematic trajectories only in girls. The interpersonal psychopathic trait (grandiose-deceitful) was more pronounced in girls with higher conduct problems scores relative to other psychopathic traits, whereas in boys, the impulsive trait stood out. Meanwhile, boys’ trajectories were more diverse in terms of negative outcomes (e.g., bullying, victimization) than those of girls. This study contributes to the body of work on heterogeneity in conduct problems by identifying different trajectories according to gender, and shows the relevance of gender in understanding the predictors, development, and outcomes of conduct problems.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Álvarez-Voces, M., Romero, E. Gender Differences in the Development of Children’s Conduct Problems: A Four-Year Longitudinal Study. J Child Fam Stud 34, 518–531 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02999-5

Relation

Has part

Has version

Is based on

Is part of

Is referenced by

Is version of

Requires

Sponsors

This study was supported by the projects PID2019-107897RB-I00 funded by MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, TED2021-130824B-C22 funded by MCIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, and by the UE “NextGenerationEU”/PRTR, and ED431C (2022/17) funded by Xunta de Galicia. In addition, this study was supported by a grant provided by the University Teacher Training Program (MAV, Reference: FPU21/00552) funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by FSE+. Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.

Rights

Attribution 4.0 International