Short Communication. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson’s SB functions to pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) and birch (Betula pubescens) stands in northwest Spain
Loading...
Identifiers
ISSN: 2171-5068
E-ISSN: 2171-9845
Publication date
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)
Abstract
Aim of study: In this study we compared the accuracy of the Weibull and the Johnson’s SB functions for describing diameter distributions in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) and birch (Betula pubescens Ehrh.) stands.
Area of study: Galicia (Northwest Spain).
Material and Methods: A total of 172 diameter distributions in pedunculate oak and 202 in birch stands were finally evaluated. We compared the accuracy of three commonly used estimation methods of the Weibull and four estimation methods of the Johnson’s SB functions for describing these diameter distributions.
Main results. For Quercus robur L. stands, the most suitable methods were the Percentiles followed by Maximum Likelihood for the Weibull PDF and the method of Moments for the Johnson’s SB PDF. For Betula pubescens Ehrh. stands, the best fits obtained with the Percentiles and Maximum Likelihood methods were also superior to the method of Moments, whereas the Conditional Maximum Likelihood and method of Moments provided the best results for the Johnson’s SB PDF, depending on the statistic and the value of the location parameter considered.
Research highlights: Both distributions were suitable. The results were better for pedunculate oak than for birch stands.
Description
Bibliographic citation
Gorgoso Varela, José Javier, Rojo Alboreca,Alberto. (2014). Short Communication. A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson’s SB functions to pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) and birch (Betula pubescens) stands in northwest Spain. "Forest Systems", Vol. 23, n.3 p. 500-505
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/fs/2014233-04939Sponsors
The present study was financially supported by the following: Asociación Galega Monte-Industria, within
the project “Elaboración de modelos de crecimiento y producción para la gestión sostenible de las masas de
abedul” (2000/CG488); the Xunta de Galicia, within the project “Estudio epidométrico de las masas de
Quercus robur L. en Galicia y su influencia sobre la calidad de la madera” (PGIDT99MA29101); and by
the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia and ERDF, within the project “Modelos dinámicos de crecimiento
y capacidad de secuestro de carbono de bosques de frondosas autóctonas del noroeste peninsular”
(AGL2007-66739-CO2-01/FOR)
The Unidade de Xestión Forestal Sostible (UXFS) is cofunded by the Xunta de Galicia («Programa de
Consolidación y Estructuración de Unidades de Investigación Competitivas 2011») and the European
Union ERDF programme
Rights
© INIA, 2014. This work is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License








