Comparison of UV, chlorination, UV-hydrogen peroxide and UV-chlorine processes for tramadol removal: Kinetics study and transformation products identification
| dc.contributor.affiliation | Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Centro de Investigación en Tecnoloxías da Información | gl |
| dc.contributor.author | Cobo Golpe, Miguel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernández Fernández, Victoria | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arias, T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramil Criado, María | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cela Torrijos, Rafael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rodríguez Pereiro, Isaac | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-11T10:36:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-11T10:36:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Tramadol (TRA) is a poorly biodegradable pharmaceutical, ubiquitously distributed in the aquatic environment. Herein, we present a thorough comparison of two conventional (UV and chlorination) and two advanced oxidative processes (UV-H2O2 and UV-chlorine), in terms of TRA removal efficiency and transformation products (TPs) formation. The performance of these processes was evaluated in different complexity water samples, previously adjusted at neutral pH. Using 1 mg L−1 as initial concentration of oxidant, UV-chlorine was the most effective process followed by UV-H2O2, direct photolysis and chlorination. The efficiency of the investigated treatments decreased for surface and wastewater samples compared to model solutions. Despite this limitation, the UV-chlorine treatment removed more than 70% of TRA measured in wastewater samples after 5 min of UV irradiation, in presence of 10 mg L−1 of chlorine. UV-chlorine involved additional degradation routes to those described for the rest of treatments, including the formation of tramadol-N-oxide, several chlorinated derivatives, and the volatile species chloroform, 1,1-dichloroacetone and anisole. Some of these specific TPs might pose a similar toxicity to that associated to the parent compound; however, their maximum formation yields remained below 2.5%, decreasing steady for reaction times longer than 5 min | gl |
| dc.description.peerreviewed | SI | gl |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was supported through grants PGC2018-094613-B-I00 and ED431C 2021/06, funded by Spanish Government (Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities) and Xunta de Galicia, respectively. Both projects are co-funded by the EU FEDER program. M.C.G. thanks a FPI fellowship to the Ministry of Science and Education (Spain) | gl |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107854 | gl |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107854 | |
| dc.identifier.essn | 2213-3437 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10347/29051 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | gl |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | gl |
| dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PGC2018-094613-B-I00/ES/ESPECTROMETRIA DE MASAS COMBINADA CON SISTEMAS DE INTRODUCCION DE MUESTRA RESUELTOS EN EL TIEMPO Y DIRECTOS. APLICACIONES ANALITICAS CUANTITATIVAS Y DE SCREENING | gl |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107854 | gl |
| dc.rights | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/) | gl |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | gl |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Tramadol | gl |
| dc.subject | Oxidative processes | gl |
| dc.subject | Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry | gl |
| dc.subject | Removal efficiency | gl |
| dc.subject | Transformation products | gl |
| dc.title | Comparison of UV, chlorination, UV-hydrogen peroxide and UV-chlorine processes for tramadol removal: Kinetics study and transformation products identification | gl |
| dc.type | journal article | gl |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | gl |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 05e62ba3-ed28-4ace-a2dc-9916ab3968a6 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | b3faf2dc-8b5b-458e-a409-9029aaa9fed1 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 86047804-77ca-4036-ace6-2c953b7b6fd8 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 05e62ba3-ed28-4ace-a2dc-9916ab3968a6 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 2022_jece_cobo_comparison.pdf
- Size:
- 1.62 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Artigo de investigación