Comparison of UV, chlorination, UV-hydrogen peroxide and UV-chlorine processes for tramadol removal: Kinetics study and transformation products identification

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Centro de Investigación en Tecnoloxías da Informacióngl
dc.contributor.authorCobo Golpe, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorFernández Fernández, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorArias, T.
dc.contributor.authorRamil Criado, María
dc.contributor.authorCela Torrijos, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Pereiro, Isaac
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-11T10:36:23Z
dc.date.available2022-08-11T10:36:23Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractTramadol (TRA) is a poorly biodegradable pharmaceutical, ubiquitously distributed in the aquatic environment. Herein, we present a thorough comparison of two conventional (UV and chlorination) and two advanced oxidative processes (UV-H2O2 and UV-chlorine), in terms of TRA removal efficiency and transformation products (TPs) formation. The performance of these processes was evaluated in different complexity water samples, previously adjusted at neutral pH. Using 1 mg L−1 as initial concentration of oxidant, UV-chlorine was the most effective process followed by UV-H2O2, direct photolysis and chlorination. The efficiency of the investigated treatments decreased for surface and wastewater samples compared to model solutions. Despite this limitation, the UV-chlorine treatment removed more than 70% of TRA measured in wastewater samples after 5 min of UV irradiation, in presence of 10 mg L−1 of chlorine. UV-chlorine involved additional degradation routes to those described for the rest of treatments, including the formation of tramadol-N-oxide, several chlorinated derivatives, and the volatile species chloroform, 1,1-dichloroacetone and anisole. Some of these specific TPs might pose a similar toxicity to that associated to the parent compound; however, their maximum formation yields remained below 2.5%, decreasing steady for reaction times longer than 5 mingl
dc.description.peerreviewedSIgl
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported through grants PGC2018-094613-B-I00 and ED431C 2021/06, funded by Spanish Government (Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities) and Xunta de Galicia, respectively. Both projects are co-funded by the EU FEDER program. M.C.G. thanks a FPI fellowship to the Ministry of Science and Education (Spain)gl
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10 (2022) 107854gl
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jece.2022.107854
dc.identifier.essn2213-3437
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/29051
dc.language.isoenggl
dc.publisherElseviergl
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PGC2018-094613-B-I00/ES/ESPECTROMETRIA DE MASAS COMBINADA CON SISTEMAS DE INTRODUCCION DE MUESTRA RESUELTOS EN EL TIEMPO Y DIRECTOS. APLICACIONES ANALITICAS CUANTITATIVAS Y DE SCREENINGgl
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107854gl
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/)gl
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessgl
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectTramadolgl
dc.subjectOxidative processesgl
dc.subjectLiquid chromatography mass spectrometrygl
dc.subjectRemoval efficiencygl
dc.subjectTransformation productsgl
dc.titleComparison of UV, chlorination, UV-hydrogen peroxide and UV-chlorine processes for tramadol removal: Kinetics study and transformation products identificationgl
dc.typejournal articlegl
dc.type.hasVersionVoRgl
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication05e62ba3-ed28-4ace-a2dc-9916ab3968a6
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb3faf2dc-8b5b-458e-a409-9029aaa9fed1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication86047804-77ca-4036-ace6-2c953b7b6fd8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery05e62ba3-ed28-4ace-a2dc-9916ab3968a6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022_jece_cobo_comparison.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artigo de investigación