Is the photobiomodulation therapy effective in controlling post-surgical side effects after the extraction of mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Cirurxía e Especialidades Médico-Cirúrxicases_ES
dc.contributor.authorVianna Camolesi, Gisela Cristina
dc.contributor.authorVieira e Silva, Fábio França
dc.contributor.authorAulestia-Viera, Patricia Verónica
dc.contributor.authorMarichalar Mendía, Xabier
dc.contributor.authorGándara Vila, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Sayáns García, Mario
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T11:48:47Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T11:48:47Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractObjectives The extraction of third molars is one of the most performed surgical procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Pain, oedema, and trismus are the most frequently complications related in the surgical postoperative period. The literature has indicated PBM as a potential adjuvant method to reduce these complications. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is evaluate the PBM, as an optimal method to improve patient experience and minimize postoperative morbidity. Additionally, we seek to determine which wavelength, site, and frequency of application are most effective. Methods This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023429966) and followed PRISMA guidelines. The search was carried out in the main databases, PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Lilacs, including reviews in the most important journals in the area of oral surgery and laser applied to oral surgery. In addition, all article references and also gray literature were reviewed. After the studies selection, the relevant data was collected. All the studies were randomized controlled trials and the patients were allocated into two groups: active PBM and inactive PBM. The statistical analysis was carried out using Stata v.16, and the methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by the Jadad scale and RoB 2.0, respectively. Results Where included 22 studies and 989 subjects, to all with a minimum follow-up of 7 days. Pain and oedema showed statistically significant results in favor to the active PBM group. Especially when laser applied in infrared mode, for pain and oedema at 48 h, MD = -1.80 (CI95% -2.88, -0.72) I² = 92.13% and MD = -1.45 (CI95% -2.42, -0.48) I² = 65.01%, respectively. The same is not true for trismus at 48 h, MD = 0.07 (CI95% -0.06, 0.21) I² = 3.26%. The meta-analysis also presented results in respect of laser site of application and number of PBM sessions. Conclusions PBM with infrared laser, in a combination intraoral and extraoral application, in one session in the immediate postoperative period, has been shown to be effective to achieve the objectives of reducing pain and oedema after third molar extraction.es_ES
dc.description.peerreviewedSIes_ES
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice Volume 24, Issue 2, June 2024, 101983es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101983
dc.identifier.issn1532-3382
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/34252
dc.journal.titleJournal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.page.initial101983
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rights©2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licensees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectLow-level light therapyes_ES
dc.subjectMandiblees_ES
dc.subjectPhotobiomodulation therapyes_ES
dc.subjectPostoperative complicationses_ES
dc.subjectTooth extractiones_ES
dc.titleIs the photobiomodulation therapy effective in controlling post-surgical side effects after the extraction of mandibular third molars? A systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfba09624-8717-4db3-afdd-e018d34469f3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1fc179e1-51df-42a8-8961-420b8d496a9e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfba09624-8717-4db3-afdd-e018d34469f3

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S1532338224000241-main.pdf
Size:
3.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: