Hard and soft tissue integration of immediate and delayed implants with a modified coronal macrodesign: Histological, micro-CT and volumetric soft tissue changes from a pre-clinical in vivo study

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Anatomía, Produción Animal e Ciencias Clínicas Veterinarias
dc.contributor.authorSanz Martín, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorVignoletti, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorNuñez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorPermuy Mendaña, María
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Guzón, Fernando María
dc.contributor.authorSanz Esporrín, Javier
dc.contributor.authorFierravante, Ludovica
dc.contributor.authorShapira, Lior
dc.contributor.authorSanz Alonso, Mariano
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T09:32:54Z
dc.date.available2025-01-24T09:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractAim: To study the healing of peri-implant tissues around implants with a triangular coronal third (test) or cylindrical (control). Materials and Methods: In eight beagle dogs, immediate and delayed implants were placed. Test and control implants were randomly assigned and the hard and soft tissue healing was evaluated with histology and micro-CT analysis at 4 and 12 weeks. The soft tissue contour changes were assessed by image analysis software. Results: When measured at the implant shoulder level, the buccal crestal width (primary outcome assessed in mm) attained similar values in test and control implants. More apically (3 mm) test implants had greater buccal crestal width in delayed and immediate sites. For vertical soft and hard tissue measurements, no significant differences were found between Test and Control. Micro-CT evaluation of the buccal volume of interest showed less volume of implant component in T implants in all sites, although bone volume was not significantly different between T/C. Soft tissue contours were similar around T/C implants. Conclusion: Triangular implants showed similar percentage of osseointegration, buccal bone volume and soft tissue contours, although attaining greater buccal crestal bone width. No differences were found in regard to soft tissue dimensions and the position of the first bone-to-implant contact.
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcpe.12747
dc.identifier.issn1600-051X
dc.identifier.issn0303-6979
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/38983
dc.issue.number8
dc.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Periodontology
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final853
dc.page.initial842
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12747
dc.rights.accessRightsrestricted access
dc.subjectAnimal model
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectHistology
dc.subjectImmediate implant
dc.subjectImplant macrodesign
dc.subjectMicro-CT
dc.subjectVolumetric analysis
dc.titleHard and soft tissue integration of immediate and delayed implants with a modified coronal macrodesign: Histological, micro-CT and volumetric soft tissue changes from a pre-clinical in vivo study
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number44
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0af5ddde-272e-4d11-9ed7-0a8bf2f81d18
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa80b7053-e349-4aaa-9aa0-fe8dc7043ac2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0af5ddde-272e-4d11-9ed7-0a8bf2f81d18

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sanz-Martin et al; 2017.pdf
Size:
1.66 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format