Working memory load modulates oscillatory activity and the distribution of fast frequencies across frontal theta phase during working memory maintenance

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a keystone of our cognitive abilities. Increasing load has been shown to dampen its performance and affect oscillatory neural activity in different frequency bands. Nevertheless, mixed results regarding fast frequencies activity and a lack of research on WM load modulations of cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling mechanisms preclude a better understanding of the impact of increased WM load levels on brain activity as well as inter-regional communication and coordination supporting WM processes. Hence, we analyzed the EEG activity of 25 participants while performing a delayed-matching-to-sample (DMS) WM task with three WM load levels. Current density power and distribution at the source level for theta, beta, and gamma frequencies during the task's delay period were compared for each pair of WM load conditions. Results showed maximal increases of theta activity in frontal areas and of fast frequencies' activity in posterior regions with WM load, showing the involvement of frontal theta activity in WM maintenance and the control of attentional resources and visual processing by beta and gamma activity. To study whether WM load modulates communication between cortical areas, posterior beta and gamma amplitudes distribution across frontal theta phase was also analysed for those areas showing the largest significant WM load modulations. Higher beta activity amplitude at bilateral cuneus and right middle occipital gyrus, and higher gamma activity amplitude at bilateral posterior cingulate were observed during frontal theta phase peak in low than high memory load conditions. Moreover, greater fast beta amplitude at the right postcentral gyrus was observed during theta phase trough at right middle frontal gyrus in high than low memory load conditions. These results show that WM load modulates whether interregional communication occurs during theoretically optimal or non-optimal time windows, depending on the demands of frontal control of posterior areas required to perform the task successfully