Evaluating the carbon footprint of a Spanish city through environmentally extended input output analysis and comparison with life cycle assessment

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Enxeñaría Química
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Ambientais (CRETUS)
dc.contributor.authorRama Caamaño, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorEntrena-Barbero, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorDias, Ana Cláudia
dc.contributor.authorMoreira Vilar, María Teresa
dc.contributor.authorFeijoo Costa, Gumersindo
dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, Sara
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-30T07:00:42Z
dc.date.available2026-04-30T07:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractCurrently, most of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are attributed to cities, as they are the global centers of business, residential and cultural activity, cities are expected to play a leading role in proposing climate change mitigation actions. To do so, it is important to have tools that allow the carbon footprint of cities to be assessed as accurately as possible. This study aims to quantify the carbon footprint (CF) associated with the activities developed in a Spanish city (Cadiz, Southwest Spain) by means of two available environmental methodologies, namely Environmentally Extended Input-Output Analysis (EEIOA) and Life Cycle assessment (LCA). When EEIOA is considered, two downscaling factors were proposed for the analysis due to the nature of the data handled (monetary data), based on the incomes (DF1) and expenditures (DF2) per inhabitant at city level. Regarding LCA, the rates of consumption of goods and production of waste per inhabitant have been processed to estimate the CF. The CF scores identified were 5.25 and 3.83 tCO2-eq·inhabitant−1·year−1 for DF1 and DF2 respectively, according to EEIOA, and 5.43 tCO2-eq·inhabitant−1·year−1, considering LCA. Therefore, a similarity can be concluded between the results obtained with both methodologies despite the inherent differences. Considering the results, the downscaling procedure based on income per inhabitant should be preferred, pointing to EEIOA as a good alternative to LCA for evaluating the CF at city level, requiring less time and effort. In contrast, EEIOA reports more limitations when critical flows were identified, which LCA can solve. Finally, this study can be of great interest to policy makers and city governments to know the CF and the main flows that contribute and in this way, can develop new policies and city models for reducing GHG emission new policies and city models for reducing GHG emission and addressing climate change.
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by a project granted by the Spanish Government and FEDER/Ministry of Science and Innovation – Spanish National Research Agency (CTQ2016-75136-P) and by a project granted by Xunta de Galicia (project ref. ED431F 2016/001). Dr. S.G.-G. would like to express her gratitude to the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for financial support (Grant reference RYC-2014-14984). Dr. A.C.D. would like to acknowledge FCT/MCTES for the financial support to CESAM (UIDB/50017/2020+UIDP/50017/2020), through national funds, and to the research contract CEECIND/02174/2017. The authors belong to the Galician Competitive Research Group GRC ED431C 2017/29 and to the CRETUS Strategic Partnership (ED431E 2018/01). All these programs are co-funded by FEDER (UE).
dc.identifier.citationScience of The Total Environment Volume 762, 25 March 2021, 143133
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143133
dc.identifier.essn1879-1026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/47015
dc.journal.titleScience of The Total Environment
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143133
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectGreenhouse gas emissions
dc.subjectSpain
dc.subjectSustainable City
dc.subjectUrban environmental management
dc.subjectUrban metabolism
dc.titleEvaluating the carbon footprint of a Spanish city through environmentally extended input output analysis and comparison with life cycle assessment
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication0a576b0a-443d-4394-a84e-54437060ce3f
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc096164c-a5ad-4a7b-ac7a-1d8817ea1e86
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc6e1c93a-e283-4a61-a88c-495550a6d318
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery0a576b0a-443d-4394-a84e-54437060ce3f

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021_scitotenv_rama_evaluating-carbon_am.pdf
Size:
391.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021_scitotenv_rama_evaluating-carbon_figures.pdf
Size:
417.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021_scitotenv_rama_evaluating-carbon_graphical-abstract.pdf
Size:
230.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021_scitotenv_rama_evaluating-carbon_tables.pdf
Size:
142.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format