Is SCENA a good approach for side-stream integrated treatment from an environmental and economic point of view?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Identifiers

Publication date

Advisors

Tutors

Editors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier BV
Metrics
Google Scholar
lacobus
Export

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The environmental and economic benefits and burdens of including the first Short Cut Enhanced Nutrient Abatement (SCENA) into a real municipal wastewater treatment plant were evaluated using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost (LCC). The implications of accomplishing nitrogen (N) removal and phosphorus (P) recovery via nitrite in the side stream were assessed taking into account the actual effluent quality improvement, the changes in the electricity and chemical consumption, N2O, CO2 and CH4 emissions and the effects of land application of biosolids, among others. In addition, a case-specific estimation of the P availability when sludge is applied to land, therefore replacing conventional fertilizer, was performed. Furthermore, to account for the variability in input parameters, and to address the related uncertainties, Monte Carlo simulation was applied. The analysis revealed that SCENA in the side stream is an economic and environmentally friendly solution compared to the traditional plant layout with no side-stream treatment, thanks to the reduction of energy and chemical use for the removal of N and P, respectively. The uncertainty analysis proved the validity of the LCA results for global warming potential and impact categories related to the consumption of fossil-based electricity and chemicals, while robust conclusions could not be drawn on freshwater eutrophication and toxicity-related impact categories. Furthermore, three optimization scenarios were also evaluated proving that the performance of the WWTP can be further improved by, for instance, substituting gravitational for mechanical thickening of the sludge or changing the operational strategy to the chemically enhanced primary treatment, although this second alternative will increase the operational cost by 5%. Finally, the outcomes show that shifting P removal from chemical precipitation in the main line to biologically enhanced uptake in the side stream is key to reducing chemicals use, thus the operational cost, and increasing the environmental benefit of synthetic fertilizers replacement

Description

Bibliographic citation

LONGO, STEFANO, FRISON, NICOLA, RENZI, DANIELE, FATONE, FRANCESCO and HOSPIDO, ALMUDENA, 2017, Is SCENA a good approach for side-stream integrated treatment from an environmental and economic point of view?. Water Research. 2017. Vol. 125, p. 478-489. DOI 10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.006. Elsevier BV

Relation

Has part

Has version

Is based on

Is part of

Is referenced by

Is version of

Requires

Sponsors

S. Longo and A. Hospido belong to the Galician Competitive Research Group GRC2013-032 and to the CRETUS strategic Partnership (AGRUP2015/02), co-funded by FEDER (EU). Besides, S. Longo and A. Hospido are supported by ‘ENERWATER’ Coordination Support Action that has received founding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649819, while N. Frison, F. Fatone and D. Renzi are supported by ‘SMART-Plant’ Innovation Action that has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 690323. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their valuable comments

Rights

© 2017 Elsevier B.V. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/