Information Discovery and Scholar Networking as Modes of Scholarly Communication: A Comparative Study

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Ciencias da Comunicación
dc.contributor.authorAbutayeh Abutayeh, Noor Saleh
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Orosa, Berta
dc.contributor.authorAl-Dwairi, Khaldoon M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-27T13:06:18Z
dc.date.available2024-11-27T13:06:18Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThis study sought to investigate information discovery and scholar networking as modes of scholarly communication across researchers in the Arab region. An online survey was distributed in December 2020 using the Google form. The questionnaire also includes the following elements: (a) what are the researchers’ purposes of using electronic resources; (b) how do researchers look for and access scholarly material and (c) what methods of networking are mostly used for scholar connection. The findings revealed no significant differences across the groups, even when it comes to gender and respondents’ discipline, it is clear that ResearchGate is the most popular among them all. Researchers holding degrees in Humanities and educational sciences like to use research platforms (M=4.37) more than social media (M=3.87). Moreover, the popularity of using Google Scholar and Google in the scholarly field are confirmed in line with previous evidences. There are highly significant differences across researchers regarding their behaviours in accessing scholarly material. Results suggest that respondents don’t consider researcher platforms like ResearchGate & Academia.edu as social media. It might be explained by the fact that research platforms like ResearchGate and Academia.edu are organized and designed for research purposes in a way that Facebook, Twitter, and Instgram are not
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.identifier.citationAbutayeh, Noor; Garcia-Orosa, Berta; and Al_Dwairi, Khaldoon M., "Information Discovery and Scholar Networking as Modes of Scholarly Communication: A Comparative Study" (2021). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 5909. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5909
dc.identifier.issn1522-0222
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/37880
dc.journal.titleLibrary Philosophy and Practice
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Nebraska: Lincoln Libraries
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5909/
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2021 The Author(s). This article was originally published in Library Philosophy and Practice (LPP) journal
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectElectronic resources
dc.subjectInformation discovery
dc.subjectSocial networking
dc.subjectScholarly communication
dc.subjectResearchers
dc.subjectArab countries
dc.titleInformation Discovery and Scholar Networking as Modes of Scholarly Communication: A Comparative Study
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication729cb1d1-8877-4fd9-84d3-05561d9a827b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery729cb1d1-8877-4fd9-84d3-05561d9a827b

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2021_lpp_abutayeh_information.pdf
Size:
642.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format