Design of biorefineries aligned with stakeholders’ preferences: How to select optimal valorization pathways?

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

Addressing agri-food waste accumulation via development of sustainable biorefineries is essential for advancing the circular bioeconomy. However, conflicting priorities of stakeholders, from feedstock producers to consumers and policymakers, are significant barriers that disrupt the selection of optimal valorization pathways. This study proposes a methodology to support early-stage biorefinery design by systematically integrating stakeholder preferences. Stakeholder insights are collected through qualitative data analysis (QDA) and translated into explicit design criteria, which are incorporated into the decision-making process. The approach combines multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to identify optimal valorization pathways with life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate environmental performance. This enables the simultaneous consideration of economic and environmental objectives while ensuring alignment with stakeholder expectations. The proposed framework serves as a practical roadmap for decision-making in biorefinery design, providing specific recommendations for selecting sustainable and stakeholder-aligned valorization strategies.

Description

Bibliographic citation

Cleaner Waste Systems Volume 14, June 2026, 100524

Relation

Has part

Has version

Is based on

Is part of

Is referenced by

Is version of

Requires

Sponsors

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the grant agreement No. 101081776, the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) fund under the UK government’s Horizon Europe funding guarantee, the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), Switzerland and from the National Key Research and Development Program supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (No. 2023YFE0104900). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of neither of the aforementioned Funding authorities. None of the cited funding authorities can be held responsible for them.

Rights

© 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
Attribution 4.0 International