Comparison of extraction methods for the recovery, amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Química Analítica, Nutrición e Bromatoloxía
dc.contributor.authorPrado Rodríguez, Marta
dc.contributor.authorFranco Abuín, Carlos Manuel
dc.contributor.authorFente Sampayo, Cristina Asunción
dc.contributor.authorCepeda Sáez, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorVázquez Belda, Beatriz Isabel
dc.contributor.authorBarros Velázquez, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-30T08:26:28Z
dc.date.available2026-01-30T08:26:28Z
dc.date.issued2002-04-23
dc.descriptionThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Prado, M., Franco, C.M., Fente, C.A., Cepeda, A., Vázquez, B.I. and Barros-Velázquez, J. (2002), Comparison of extraction methods for the recovery, amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals. ELECTROPHORESIS, 23: 1005-1012, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200204)23:7/8<1005::AID-ELPS1005>3.0.CO;2-1. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited
dc.description.abstractWe report the effect of several parameters on the efficiency of recovery of DNA from animal bones. The effects of preheating the samples (at either 60°C or 100°C) at different intervals (from 1 h to overnight) in different media (water, 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), or 0.5 M EDTA + 0.05% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were investigated. The effect of slight (5 min) or intense (30 min) pretreatments with ultrasound was also evaluated. Several different treatments with proteinase K (ranging from 200 to 800 νg, and lasting from 1 to 3 h) at 65°C were also considered. Additionally, two different DNA extraction methods (based on silica resins and purification columns, respectively) were evaluated. The recovery of DNA from the samples was 40% higher when the bones were preheated in 0.5 M EDTA at 60°C for 1 h, this being followed by treatment with 800 νg of proteinase K for 3 h. The DNA thus obtained was successfully amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a set of primers specific to a 359 bp region of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, and the species of origin were identified by visualizing the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) with the endonucleases PalI and MboI
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.identifier.citationPrado, M., Franco, C.M., Fente, C.A., Cepeda, A., Vázquez, B.I. and Barros-Velázquez, J. (2002), Comparison of extraction methods for the recovery, amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals. ELECTROPHORESIS, 23: 1005-1012. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200204)23:7/8<1005::AID-ELPS1005>3.0.CO;2-1
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/1522-2683(200204)23:7/8<1005::AID-ELPS1005>3.0.CO;2-1
dc.identifier.essn0173-0835
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/45602
dc.issue.number7-8
dc.journal.titleElectrophoresis
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.final1012
dc.page.initial1005
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2683(200204)23:7/8<1005::AID-ELPS1005>3.0.CO;2-1
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.subjectBone meals
dc.subjectDNA recovery
dc.subjectExtraction methods
dc.subjectPolymerase chain reaction
dc.titleComparison of extraction methods for the recovery, amplification and species-specific analysis of DNA from bone and bone meals
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionAM
dc.volume.number23
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication05453775-e676-4129-9a80-97aacf7e28ec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication452930b2-2fec-4872-82dd-22b3d8dab629
relation.isAuthorOfPublication87578cf0-0744-45bf-81a6-b70d4d684735
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7bd9be49-7b63-4309-87d3-e99946646d6d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa463f438-445a-4e6d-8b15-cf686293f5c2
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5f485b60-560e-46c8-a6df-4e398fbc01de
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery05453775-e676-4129-9a80-97aacf7e28ec

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2002_Electr_Prado_Comparison.pdf
Size:
326.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format