Comparative Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods in Marine Teleost Cell Lines

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Química Física
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Zooloxía, Xenética e Antropoloxía Física
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Física Aplicada
dc.contributor.authorArana Díaz, Álvaro Jesús
dc.contributor.authorVeiga Rúa, Sara
dc.contributor.authorCora Calvo, Diego
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Gómez, Manuel Antonio
dc.contributor.authorSeijas Cerceda, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCarballeda Álvarez, Maialen
dc.contributor.authorPolo Montero, David
dc.contributor.authorCuesta, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorPiñeiro Redondo, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorRivas Rey, José
dc.contributor.authorNovo, Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorAl-Soufi, Wajih
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Portela, Paulino
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Piñón, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRobledo Sánchez, Diego
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-14T09:19:53Z
dc.date.available2025-11-14T09:19:53Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractGene editing technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 have revolutionized functional genomics, yet their application in marine fish cell lines remains limited by inefficient delivery. This study compares three delivery strategies—electroporation, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), and magnetofection using gelatin-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs)—for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the ifi27l2a gene in DLB-1 and SaB-1 cell lines. We evaluated transfection and editing efficiency, intracellular Cas9 localization, and genomic stability of the target locus. Electroporation achieved up to 95% editing in SaB-1 under optimized conditions, but only 30% in DLB-1, which exhibited locus-specific genomic rearrangements. Diversa LNPs enabled intracellular delivery and moderate editing (~25%) in DLB-1 but yielded only minimal editing in SaB-1, while SPION-based magnetofection resulted in efficient uptake but no detectable editing, highlighting post-entry barriers. Confocal imaging and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy suggested that nuclear localization and Cas9 aggregation may influence editing success, highlighting the importance of intracellular trafficking in CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. Our findings demonstrate that CRISPR/Cas9 delivery efficiency is cell line-dependent and governed by intracellular trafficking and genomic integrity. These insights provide a practical framework for optimizing gene editing in marine teleosts, advancing both basic research and selective breeding in aquaculture
dc.description.peerreviewedSI
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the collaborative project at Campus Terra, University of Santiago de Compostela, within the framework of the Collaboration Agreement between the USC and the Department of Culture, Education, Vocational Training, and Universities, and it was also funded by Fundación Caixa Rural Galega Tomás Notario Vacas within the project Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to improve disease resistance in aquaculture. Additionally, this research was carried out under the framework of Spain’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, specifically under investment line nº 1 and component number 17, which includes the Complementary RTDI Plan for Marine Science. This work also was funded by the European Union ERC Starting Grant programme 2022 under grant agreement No 101076432 (FishTRIM). DR was supported by the Oportunius programme of the Axencia Galega de Innovación (GAIN, Xunta de Galicia), and by BBSRC Institute Strategic Grants to the Roslin Institute (BBS/E/20002172, BBS/E/D/30002275, BBS/E/D/10002070 and BBS/E/RL/230002A). D.P. was supported by a Ramón y Cajal grant (RYC2023-044793-I) funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (MICIU), Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI), and ESF+ (10.13039/501100011033). Finally, this work was supported by project PID2022-137821OB-C31, funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, 2022
dc.identifier.citationArana, Á. J., Veiga-Rua, S., Cora, D., Gónzalez-Gómez, M. A., Seijas, A., Carballeda, M., Polo, D., Cuesta, A., Piñeiro, Y., Rivas, J., Novo, M., Al-Soufi, W., Martínez, P., Sánchez, L., & Robledo, D. (2025). Comparative Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods in Marine Teleost Cell Lines. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21), 10703. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110703
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijms262110703
dc.identifier.essn1422-0067
dc.identifier.issn1661-6596
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/43780
dc.issue.number21
dc.journal.titleJournal of Molecular Sciences
dc.language.isoeng
dc.page.initial10703
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PID2022-137821OB-C31/ES/EPIGENOMICA PARA MEJORAR LA REPRODUCCION DEL LENGUADO SENEGALES: COMUNICACION QUIMICA Y DETERMINACION DEL SEXO
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101076432/EU/The evolution and function of fish TRIM E3 ubiquitin ligases/FishTRIM
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110703
dc.rights© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.accessRightsopen access
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectCRISPR
dc.subjectCas9
dc.subjectGene editing
dc.subjectEditing efficiency
dc.subjectAquaculture
dc.subjectSea bass
dc.subjectSea bream
dc.titleComparative Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Methods in Marine Teleost Cell Lines
dc.typejournal article
dc.type.hasVersionVoR
dc.volume.number26
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9bd0be46-394e-41ba-9b90-b67d37a9fb51
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7882f79e-b8a5-4f67-af88-93497f0f6a09
relation.isAuthorOfPublication04341b4a-d49c-44c0-bfeb-b646dc286ddc
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb93d54f0-7941-4717-887f-1ef5ca4c6a17
relation.isAuthorOfPublication383c1bb0-bd2a-4f30-a468-590221b0a700
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationee8e56a4-dc03-415a-b684-9ad0d72d90e1
relation.isAuthorOfPublication06d9a1dc-5565-4154-9e24-3a0407b9cd33
relation.isAuthorOfPublication017b2725-d3de-40d7-8859-18c50f038d1d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf5d5e52d-f2d6-4b02-8995-75ec34d28e84
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery9bd0be46-394e-41ba-9b90-b67d37a9fb51

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2025_ijms_arana_comparative.pdf
Size:
3.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format