Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?

dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Fisioloxíagl
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Seara, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorGude Sampedro, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Sande, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorFernández López, Xesús Alberte
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Mañero, Moisés
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Melchor, Laila
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Álvarez, Belén
dc.contributor.authorIglesias Álvarez, Diego
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Juanatey, José Ramón
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-19T11:33:43Z
dc.date.available2017-10-19T11:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients admitted to our hospital for a CTI ablation between 1998 and 2010. The patients were divided into four categories: 1) newonset AF (no prior AF and AF during follow-up (FU)); 2) old AF (prior AF and no AF during FU); 3) prior and post AF (AF prior and post CTI ablation); and 4) no AF. Results: Four hundred and eight patients were included. In patients without prior AF, the hazard ratio (HR) for new-onset AF during FU was 0.98 (CI 95%: 0.65–1.50; p = 0.95) and 1.00 (CI 95%: 0.57–1.77; p = 0.98) for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. In patients with prior AF, the HR for AF was 1.41 (CI 95%: 0.87–2.28;p = 0.17) and 1.79 (CI 95%: 0.96–3.35; p = 0.06), for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. Left atrial enlargement was positively correlated with the occurrence of AF during FU, especially in the subgroup without prior AF, which had a HR of 2.44 (CI 95%: 1.35–4.40; p = 0.003), a HR of 2.88 (CI 95%: 1.36–6.10; p = 0.006) and a HR of 3.68 (CI 95%: 1.71–7.94; p = 0.001), for slight, moderate and severely dilated left atrial dimension, respectively, compared with a normal value. Conclusions: HATCH score did not predict AF in patients with typical AFl who underwent CTI ablation. Basal left atrium dimension could help predict new-onset AF.gl
dc.description.peerreviewedSIgl
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Seara J, Gude Sampedro F, Martínez Sande JL, et al. Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? International Journal of Cardiology Heart & Vasculature. 2016;12:88-94. doi:10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006.gl
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006
dc.identifier.issn2352-9067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10347/15868
dc.language.isoenggl
dc.publisherIJC Heart & Vasculaturegl
dc.relation.publisherversiondoi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006gl
dc.rights© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).gl
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessgl
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAtrial fluttergl
dc.subjectCavotricuspid isthmus ablationgl
dc.subjectAtrial fibrillationgl
dc.subjectHATCHgl
dc.subjectCHA2DS2VAScgl
dc.subject.classificationMaterias::Investigación::32 Ciencias médicas::3213 Cirugía::321307 Cirugía del corazóngl
dc.titleIs HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?gl
dc.typejournal articlegl
dc.type.hasVersionVoRgl
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublication61ef7bd7-5fc0-4694-82ef-d102c16b2204
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd52aae38-d8dc-4796-be04-cc73866bf7d0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery61ef7bd7-5fc0-4694-82ef-d102c16b2204

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016_IJC Heart_Garcia_IsHatch.pdf
Size:
733.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Collections