Clones of enterotoxigenic and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli implicated in swine enteric colibacillosis in Spain and rates of antibiotic resistance
Loading...
Identifiers
Publication date
Advisors
Tutors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Shiga toxin–producing E. coli (STEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) are the main agents of swine colibacillosis, an infectious disease which implies important economic losses. We characterized here 186 diarrheagenic E. coli from Spanish industrial pig farms (2005-2017) to know which clones were involved in this syndrome, and the rates of antibiotic resistance. The PCR based on pathotype-associated virulence genes determined that 161 of 186 isolates (86.5 %) exhibited the ETEC pathotype, 10 (5.4 %) the STEC pathotype, and 15 (8.1 %) the hybrid ETEC/STEC pathotype. The majority of the isolates showed phylogroup A (85.5 %), clonotype CH11-24 (72 %) and belonged to the clonal complex (CC) 10, including two ETEC clones accounting for around 50 % of the 186 isolates: O157:HNM-A-ST10 (CH11-24), which exhibited mostly the fimbrial antigen F4ac; and O108:HNM-A-ST10 (CH11-24), which exhibited mainly F18. Other associations were O139:H1-E-ST1 (CH2-54) with the STEC pathotype, and both O141:H4-A-CC10 (CH11-24) and O138:HNM-E-ST42 (CH28-41) with ETEC/STEC. We found that 87.1 % of the isolates were multidrug-resistant, including 9% ESBL-producers, with the highest rates to nalidixic acid (82 %), colistin (77 %), ticarcillin (76 %) and ampicillin (76 %). Besides, more than 50 % of isolates showed non-susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sufamethoxazole and chloramphenicol. Additionally, 11 out of 17 ESBL-producing isolates were mcr-carriers. Results suggest that O108:HNM-A-ST10 (CH11-24) F18 is an emerging clone taking space left by other classical serogroups. Further follow-up studies on predominant clones in pig colibacillosis are essential for the update of vaccines, as alternative to the use of antibiotics.
Description
Keywords
Bibliographic citation
Veterinary Microbiology Volume 252, January 2021, 108924
Relation
Has part
Has version
Is based on
Is part of
Is referenced by
Is version of
Requires
Publisher version
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108924Sponsors
This study was supported by the projects AGL2016-79343-R and PID2019-104439RB-C21 / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033 from the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain), cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union: a Way to Making Europe (FEDER); PI16/01477 from Plan Estatal de ICDCI 2013–2016, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Subdirección General de Evaluación y Fomento de la Investigación, and FEDER; ED431C 2017/57 from the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria (Xunta de Galicia) and FEDER; and by the Strategic Researcher Cluster BioReDeS funded by the Regional Government Xunta de Galicia under the project no. ED431E 2018/09. IG-M and VG acknowledge the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia for their pre-doctoral and post-doctoral grants (Grant Numbers ED481A-2015/149, and ED481B-2018/018, respectively).
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International








